Every credit bureau sells you one company at a time. Reassemble the same open data into a graph and you see what no single report can: who's dying, where the capital is really flowing, and what the databases can't see. Below are five signals, each rebuilt from free public sources, each sourced.
Each stat is computed from the dataset below — not asserted. Estimates are marked. Hover any source.
Latest disclosed fiscal year. Mixed models are labelled (a for-sale developer's revenue is unit sales; an owner-developer's is rental income) — the graph keeps them honest rather than blending them. EST = estimated / not fully comparable.
| Developer | Model | FY | Revenue |
Result |
Margin | Soliditet | Status | Public work | Src |
|---|
Developers de-risk by forward-selling rental projects to institutions. Aggregate the press-reported deals and a concentration appears that no single announcement reveals.
A live pull of every Swedish public residential-construction award since 2021. The market is won by contractors, not developers — because developer capital moves through markanvisning and private forward-sale, which no procurement feed captures. That gap is the whole thesis.
This page is a real slice of the industry, built from open data with no paid subscriptions. The same engine scales to every Nordic AB, and — because the value is the joins, not the rows — the deepest tier is the one your own AI plugs into and queries directly.